Some experimental design and statistical criteria for analysis of studies in manuscripts submitted for consideration for publication

ثبت نشده
چکیده

This editorial discusses some statistical principles that may be useful in guiding authors of manuscripts submitted to Animal Feed Science and Technology (AFST) for consideration for publication. The editorial also discusses some common experimental designs and statistical models used by AFST authors, including some of the most frequent problems that cause misunderstandings and disputes among authors, reviewers and editors. The editorial is not meant as an exhaustive treatise on all possible experimental design and statistical issues that could arise, but as a general guide to correctly interpret results that are not meant to limit anyone’s imagination, as there are many ways to evaluate and examine biological responses. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Automatizing the Assignment of the Submitted Manuscripts to Reviewers: A Systematic Review of Research Texts

Purpose: To systematicly review the automatazation of the assignment of the submitted manuscripts to reviewers in order to identify the status of research studies in this field in terms of types of evidence of expertise, types of retrieval models used, and the research gaps, and finally some suggestions for has been offered for future research. Method: The current research followed the systema...

متن کامل

Peer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers

The invisible hands of peer reviewers play a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international English-medium journals. This study builds on the assumption that non-native researchers and prospective academic authors may find the whole strive for publication, and more specifically, the tough review process, less threatening if they are aware of journal reviewers’ expectation...

متن کامل

Iranian Scholars’ Revision of Their Submitted Manuscripts: Signaling Impersonality in Text

Nonnative English-speaking scholars have often been reported to be at a disadvantage vis-à-vis their English native counterparts when it comes to writing a publishable research article (RA). When they submit their manuscripts to English-language journals, they sometimes receive comments criticizing their faulty English. One area of difficulty for these authors is the grammaticalization of neutr...

متن کامل

معیارهای عینی و دهنی داوران در داوری مقالات چاپ و یا رد شده مجله مدیریت سلامت: سال‌های 92-90

Introduction: Peer-review is one of the important pre-publication steps for academic papers. It usually assures the readers about the high-quality reporting of scientific findings. Since objective and subjective criteria used by the reviewers are effective factors on the quality of journal, this study aims to assess these criteria for the accepted and rejected manuscripts of Journal Health Admi...

متن کامل

Requirements for Effective Evaluation in Nursing Education: a Qualitative Study

Introduction: There are many studies about evaluation in nursing education and its problems in Iran, but no study has been reported on the requirements for effective evaluation. This study aimed to explore academic managers' perceptions about requirements for effective evaluation in nursing education in Iran. Methods: This qualitative study was performed in year 2010. Semistructured individua...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006